重要提示:请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁!
查看《购买须知》>>>
首页 > 学历类考试
网友您好,请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:
搜题
拍照、语音搜题,请扫码下载APP
扫一扫 下载APP
题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

What Is Death? People in the past did not question the difference between life and de

What Is Death?

People in the past did not question the difference between life and death. They could see that a person died when his heart stopped beating. People have learned, however, that the body does not die immediately when the heart stops beating. They discovered that we remain alive as long as our brain remains active. Today the difference between life and death is not as easy to see as in the past. Modern medical devices can keep the heart beating and the lungs breathing long after the brain stops. But is this life?

This question has caused much debate among citizens in the United States. Many of them want a law that says a person is dead when the brain dies. A person should be considered dead when brain waves stop even if machines can keep the body alive. Such a law would permit doctors to speed removal (切除) of undiseased (没病的) organs for transplant (移植) operations.

The brain is made of thousands of millions of nerve cells. These cells send and receive millions of chemical and electrical messages every day. In this way the brain controls the other body activities. Nerve-cell experts say it is usually easy to tell when the brain has died. They put small electrodes (电极) on a person's skull (头骨) to measure the electrical signals that pass in and out of the brain. These brain waves are recorded on a television screen or on paper. The waves move up and down every time the brain receives messages from the nerve cells. The brain is dead when the waves stop moving.

Although there are people who oppose the idea of a law on brain block for various reasons, the idea of brain wave activity as a test of death is slowly being accepted.

第 31 题 People in the past held that the difference between life and death

A.did not exist.

B.was easy to tell.

C.lay in the brain.

D.was open to debate.

答案
查看答案
更多“What Is Death? People in the past did not question the difference between life and de”相关的问题

第1题

听力原文: Police in Singapore are investigating the death of a young soccer player who was
beaten to death by a group of men on his way home from a bar.

Seventeen-year-old Sulaiman Hashim died of head injuries in a hospital Thursday after a confrontation with seven men who beat him with rods or sticks.

No arrests have been made and police are investigating the motive for the attack.

What was Sulaiman Hashim?

A.He was a soccer fan.

B.He was a soccer player.

C.He was a bartender.

D.Fie was a student.

点击查看答案

第2题

Americans fully realized what Edison's inventions meant when they________.A.heard of his

Americans fully realized what Edison's inventions meant when they________.

A.heard of his death

B.heard of the plan to honor him

C.first used electric power

D.tried to carry out the plan

点击查看答案

第3题

"...People who die wondering, what if?" (Line 3, Para. 3 ) refers to" those ______ ".A.wh

"...People who die wondering, what if?" (Line 3, Para. 3 ) refers to" those ______ ".

A.who think too much of the dark side of life

B.who regret giving up their career halfway

C.who think a lot without making a decision

D.who are full of imagination even upon death

点击查看答案

第4题

The practice of capital punishment is as old as government itself.For most of history, it

The practice of capital punishment is as old as government itself. For most of history, it has not been considered controversial. Since ancient times most governments have punished a wide variety of crimes by death and have conducted executions as a routine part of the administration of criminal law. However, in the mid-18th century, social critics in Europe began to emphasize the worth of the individual and to criticize government practices they considered unjust, including capital punishment. The controversy and debate over whether governments should utilize the death penalty continue today.

The first significant movement to abolish the death penalty began during the era known as the Age of Enlightenment. In 1764 Italian jurist and philosopher Cesare Becearia published an essay on Crimes and Punishments. Many consider this influential work the leading document in the early campaign against capital punishment. Other individuals who campaigned against executions during this period include French authors Voltaire and Denis Diderot, British philosophers David Hume and Adam Smith, and political theorist Thomas Paine in the United States.

Critics of capital punishment argue that it is cruel and inhumane, while supporters consider it a necessary form. of revenge for terrible crimes. Those who advocate the death penalty declare that it is a uniquely effective punishment that prevents crime. However, advocates and opponents of the death penalty dispute the proper interpretation of statistical analyses of its preventing effect. Opponents of capital punishment see the death penalty as a human rights issue involving the proper limits of governmental power. In contrast, those who want governments to continue to execute tend to regard capital punishment as an issue of criminal justice policy. Because of these alternative viewpoints, there is a profound difference of opinion not only about what is the fight answer on capital punishment, but also about what type of question is being asked when the death penalty becomes a public issue.

We can learn from the first paragraph that in ancient times ______.

A.death penalty had been carried out before government came into being

B.people thought it was right for the government to conduct executions

C.death penalty was practiced scarcely in European countries

D.many people considered capital punishment unjust and cruel

点击查看答案

第5题

It is said that in England death is pressing, in Canada inevitable and in California optio
nal. Small wonder. Americans' life expectancy has nearly doubled over the past century. Failing hips can be replaced, clinical depression controlled, cataracts removed in a 30-minute surgical procedure. Such advances offer the aging population a quality of life that was unimaginable when I entered medicine 50 years ago. But not even a great health-care system can cure death—and our failure to confront that reality now threatens this greatness of ours.

Death is normal; we are genetically programmed to disintegrate and perish, even under ideal conditions. We all under stand that at some level, yet as medical consumers we treat death as a problem to be solved. Shielded by third-party payers from the cost of our care, we demand everything that can possibly be done for us, even if it's useless. The most obvious example is late-stage cancer care. Physicians—frustrated by their inability to cure the disease and fearing loss of hope in the patient—too often offer aggressive treatment far beyond what is scientifically justified.

In 1950, the U.S. spent $12.7 billion on health care. In 2002, the cost will be $1540 billion. Anyone can see this trend is unsustainable. Yet few seem willing to try to reverse it. Some scholars conclude that a government with finite re sources should simply stop paying for medical care that sustains life beyond a certain age—say 83 or so. Former Colorado governor Richard Lamm has been quoted as saying that the old and infirm "have a duty to die and get out of the way", so that younger, healthier people can realize their potential.

I would not go that far. Energetic people now routinely work through their 60s and beyond, and remain dazzlingly productive. At 78, Viacom chairman Stunner Redstone jokingly claims to be 53. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor is in her 70s, and former surgeon general C. Everett Koop chairs an Internet start-up in his 80s. These leaders are living proof that prevention works and that we can manage the health problems that come naturally with age. As a mere 68-year-old, I wish to age as productively as they have.

Yet there are limits to what a society can spend in this pursuit. Ask a physician, I know the most costly and dramatic measures may be ineffective and painful. I also know that people in Japan and Sweden, countries that spend far less on medical care, have achieved longer, healthier lives than we have. As a nation, we may be overfunding the quest for unlikely cures while underfunding research on humbler therapies that could improve people's lives.

What is implied in the first sentence?

A.Americans are better prepared for death than other people.

B.Americans enjoy a higher life quality than ever before.

C.Americans are over-confident of their medical technology.

D.Americans take a vain pride in their long life expectancy.

点击查看答案

第6题

Cora made a cash gift of £300,000 to her niece on 30 April 2010.She then made a cash gift

Cora made a cash gift of £300,000 to her niece on 30 April 2010.

She then made a cash gift of £500,000 to her nephew on 31 May 2011.

Both of these amounts are stated after deducting available exemptions.

Cora subsequently died on 31 October 2015.

What amount of inheritance tax was payable as a result of Cora’s death in respect of the cash gift of £500,000 to her nephew?

A.£190,000

B.£110,000

C.£114,000

D.£105,000

点击查看答案

第7题

Which sentences use the rhetorical device of irony?

A、The American dream promised older people that if they worked hard enough all their lives, things would turn out well for them.

B、But what are an individual’s chances for a “good” old age in America, with satisfying final years and a dignified death?

C、And though I’m as leery of certain polls as anyone, this margin of credulity is too wide to be discounted.

D、He stands there, his feet braced, his head high from the soaring mountain of his huge neck, and he wonders where he is.

点击查看答案

第8题

Text 4 It is said that in England death is pressing, in Canada inevitable and in Californi
a optional Small wonder. Americans' life expectancy has nearly doubled over the past century. Failing hips can be replaced, clinical depression controlled, cataracts removed in a 30-minuts surgical procedure. Such advances offer the aging population a quality of life that was unimaginable when I entered medicine 50 years ago. But not even a great health-care system can cure death-and our failure to confront that reality now threatens this greatness of ours. Death is normal; we are genetically programmed to disintegrate and perish, even under ideal conditions. We all understand that at some level, yet as medical consumers we treat death as a problem to be solved. Shielded by third-party payers from the cost of our care, we demand everything that can possibly be done for us, even if it's useless. The most obvious example is late-stage cancer care. Physicians-frustrated by their inability to cure the disease and fearing loss of hope in the patient-too often offer aggressive treatment far beyond what is scientifically justified.

In1950, the U.S. spent .7 billion on health care. In 2002, the cost will be billion. Anyone can see this trend is unsustainable. Yet few seem willing to try to reverse it. Some scholars conclude that a government with finite resources should simply stop paying for medical care that sustains life beyond a certain age-----say 83 or so. Former Colorado governor Richard Lamm has been quoted as saying that the old and infirm“have a duty todie and get out of the way”,so that younger, healthier people can realize their potential.

I would not go that far. Energetic people now routinely work through their 60s and beyond, and remain dazzlingly productive. At 78,Viacom chairman Sumner Redstone jokingly claims to be 53.Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor is in her 70s,and former surgeon general C.Everett Koop chairs an Internet start-up in his 80s.These leaders are living proof that prevention works and that we can manage the health problems that come naturally with age. As a mere 68-year-old,I wish to age as productively as they have.

Yet there are limits to what a society can spend in this pursuit. Ask a physician, I know the most costly and dramatic measures may be ineffective and painful. I also know that people in Japan and Sweden, countries that spend far less on medical care, have achieved longer, healthier lives than we have. As a nation, we may be overfunding the quest for unlikely cures while underfunding research on humbler therapies that could improve people's lives.

第56题:What is implied in the first sentence?

A. Americans are better prepared for death than other people.

B. Americans enjoy a higher life quality than ever before.

C. Americans are over-confident of their medical technology.

D. Americans take a vain pride in their long life expectancy.

点击查看答案

第9题

Even the newest gardener realizes that plants die without water; what is not so well known
is that plants die equally decisively, though not so quickly, if they are overwatered. Beginners usually decide to play it safe and keep their potted plants thoroughly wet. In consequence, death by drowning is one of the commonest disasters to befall the plants of a new horticulturist. Plants wither away if they don't get enough water, and this draws attention to their problem. A plant that has been slightly underwatered so that it droops strikes terror into the heart of its new owner. But it will, in fact, recover completely as long as rescue comes in time and the process is not repeated too often. Overwatered plants, unfortunately, do not give any such obvious signal; slowly they cease to thrive and the first visible indication of serious trouble is a yellowing of the lower leaves. Unless the overwatered pot soil is given a considerable period without water, during which time the plant will continue to look wretched, it will suddenly collapse in exactly the same way as the underwatered plant but with no chance of being revived(复活)because the roots have rotted away.

From the text we can infer a horticulturist is person engaged in ______.

A.growing plants

B.raising birds

C.cutting plants

D.studying the death cause of plants

点击查看答案

第10题

A very important world problem is the increasing number of people who actually inhabit thi
s planet. The limited amount of land and land resources will soon be unable to support the huge population if it continues to grow at its present rate.

So why is this huge increase in population taking place? It is really due to the spread of the knowledge and practice of what is becoming known as "Death Control". You have no doubt heard of the term "Birth Control". "Death Control" is something rather different. It recognises the work of the doctors and scientists who now keep alive people who, not very long ago, would have died of a variety of then incurable diseases. Through a wide variety of technological innovations that include farming methods and the control of deadly diseases, we have found ways to reduce the rate at which we die. However, this success is the very cause of the greatest threat to mankind.

If we examine the amount of land available for this ever-increasing population, we begin to see the problem. If everyone on the planet had an equal share of land, we would each have about 50,000 square metres. This figure seems to be quite encouraging until we examine the amount of usable land we actually have. More than three-fifths of the worlds land cannot produce food.

Obviously, with so little land to support us, we should be taking great care not to reduce it further. But we are not! Instead, we are consuming its "capital" — its nonrenewable fossil fuels and other mineral deposits that took millions of years to form. but which are now being destroyed in decades. We are also doing the same with other vital resources not usually thought of as being nonrenewable such as fertile soils, groundwater and the millions of other species that share the earth with us.

It is a very common belief that the problems of the population explosion are caused mainly by poor people living in poor countries who do not know enough to limit their reproduction. This is not true. The actual number of people in an area is not as important as the effect they have on nature. Developing countries do have an effect on their environment, but it is the populations of richer countries that have a far greater impact on the earth as a whole.

According to the passage, what contributes to the population increase?

A.Human beings" ignorance.

B.The failure of "Birth Control".

C.The success of "Death Control".

D.Technological innovations.

点击查看答案

第11题

The following scenario relates to questions 1–5.

Adana died on 17 March 2016, and inheritance tax (IHT) of £566,000 is payable in respect of her chargeable estate. Under the terms of her will, Adana left her entire estate to her children.

At the date of her death, Adana had the following debts and liabilities:

(1) An outstanding interest-only mortgage of £220,000.

(2) Income tax of £43,700 payable in respect of the tax year 2015–16.

(3) Legal fees of £4,600 incurred by Adana’s sister which Adana had verbally promised to pay.

Adana’s husband had died on 28 May 2006, and only 20% of his inheritance tax nil rate band was used on his death. The nil rate band for the tax year 2006–07 was £285,000.

On 22 April 2006, Adana had made a chargeable lifetime transfer of shares valued at £500,000 to a trust. Adana paid the lifetime IHT of £52,250 arising from this gift. If Adana had not made this gift, her chargeable estate at the time of her death would have been £650,000 higher than it otherwise was. This was because of the subsequent increase in the value of the gifted shares.

What is the maximum nil rate band which will have been available when calculating the IHT of £566,000 payable in respect of Adana’s chargeable estate?

A.£325,000

B.£553,000

C.£390,000

D.£585,000

What is the total amount of deductions which would have been permitted in calculating Adana’s chargeable estate for IHT purposes?A.£263,700

B.£268,300

C.£43,700

D.£220,000

Who will be responsible for paying the IHT of £566,000 in respect of Adana’s chargeable estate, and what is the due date for the payment of this liability?A.The beneficiaries of Adana’s estate (her children) on 30 September 2016

B.The beneficiaries of Adana’s estate (her children) on 17 September 2016

C.The personal representatives of Adana’s estate on 30 September 2016

D.The personal representatives of Adana’s estate on 17 September 2016

How much IHT did Adana save by making the chargeable lifetime transfer of £500,000 to a trust on 22 April 2006, rather than retaining the gifted investments until her death?A.£260,000

B.£207,750

C.£147,750

D.£200,000

How much of the IHT payable in respect of Adana’s estate would have been saved if, under the terms of her will, Adana had made specific gifts of £400,000 to a trust and £200,000 to her grandchildren, instead of leaving her entire estate to her children?A.£240,000

B.£160,000

C.£0

D.£80,000

点击查看答案
下载APP
关注公众号
TOP
重置密码
账号:
旧密码:
新密码:
确认密码:
确认修改
购买搜题卡查看答案 购买前请仔细阅读《购买须知》
请选择支付方式
  • 微信支付
  • 支付宝支付
点击支付即表示同意并接受了《服务协议》《购买须知》
立即支付 系统将自动为您注册账号
已付款,但不能查看答案,请点这里登录即可>>>
请使用微信扫码支付(元)

订单号:

遇到问题请联系在线客服

请不要关闭本页面,支付完成后请点击【支付完成】按钮
遇到问题请联系在线客服
恭喜您,购买搜题卡成功 系统为您生成的账号密码如下:
重要提示:请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁。
发送账号到微信 保存账号查看答案
怕账号密码记不住?建议关注微信公众号绑定微信,开通微信扫码登录功能
请用微信扫码测试
优题宝